http://designthemedia.com Sun, 12 Feb 2012 16:21:33 +0000 240 http://designthemedia.com/favicon.ico http://designthemedia.com http://designthemedia.com/topic/94-solved-upgrade-lfo-201-does-not-store-custom-wave/ Using last ableton version 8.2.8 and Max 5, the LFO doesn`t store its custom wave. Using Matrix too, so I will not update Max 6. Sun, 12 Feb 2012 16:21:33 +0000 http://designthemedia.com/topic/94-solved-upgrade-lfo-201-does-not-store-custom-wave/ http://designthemedia.com/topic/92-smooth-paramter/
loving the LFO2! Great that you can have high sync values like 64 bars and I really like the way the "offset" parameter is implementet. You can still "play and twist" the knob while its modulated!

But I noticed a issue in combination with filters or volume. That said, it's of course not our LFO in particular, but a problem a lot LFOs have.

When I modulate the volume or a filter with the LFO I get stepping or zipper noise. It's obvious why, but maybe it would be an idea to add a high resolution mode or a smooth parameter to interpolate the "stair steps" from the modulation signal away? Too bad that we cant have a LFO at sample rate with low CPU consumption. :-)

Best regards]]> Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:45:18 +0000 http://designthemedia.com/topic/92-smooth-paramter/ http://designthemedia.com/topic/86-lfo-20-problem/
The select function doesn't work, and whe I press track, device, or parameters, it turns blank. Is anyone having the same problem?]]> Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:57:25 +0000 http://designthemedia.com/topic/86-lfo-20-problem/ http://designthemedia.com/topic/14-lfo-feature-requests-list/ - parameters storage]]> Mon, 06 Feb 2012 12:59:21 +0000 http://designthemedia.com/topic/14-lfo-feature-requests-list/ http://designthemedia.com/topic/85-one-more-improvement-longer-lfo-cycles/
While you're at it , I think LFO would really benefit from some longer cycles , like 8. 16, 32 or even 64 bars would be nice , just as long as they don't step ladder as they move ....just a thought , I'm having a lot of fun with this tool!!]]> Sun, 05 Feb 2012 11:12:42 +0000 http://designthemedia.com/topic/85-one-more-improvement-longer-lfo-cycles/ http://designthemedia.com/topic/84-an-improvement-to-lfo-would-be-a-shrinkable-width/ Wed, 01 Feb 2012 20:04:43 +0000 http://designthemedia.com/topic/84-an-improvement-to-lfo-would-be-a-shrinkable-width/ http://designthemedia.com/topic/82-auto-mapping-with-apc40/
As many m4l devices, parameters are automatically mapped on APC 40 , but in a non-logical order

Do you know how to config those parameters in m4l ? (i can use instrument rack of course, but with APC40, in this case, all default mapping with Live integrated devices are gone , because manual mapping has the priority against default mapping)]]> Wed, 01 Feb 2012 11:35:52 +0000 http://designthemedia.com/topic/82-auto-mapping-with-apc40/ http://designthemedia.com/topic/11-lfo-additional-controls-for-return-and-master-tracks/
In addition to the "tracks" devices parameters available, would it be possible to add the "return_tracks" and "master_track" objects collection ?

Refering the LOM, I understand objects structure remains the same whether in "tracks" or "return_tracks", same goes for the unique "master_track".
I guess it's the query feeding the track (first) dropdown list, the rest of the logical implementation should remain the same, however could be nice to distinguish easily the different families: tracks, returns and master when opens up the track (first) dropdown list.

Thanks.]]> Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:59:28 +0000 http://designthemedia.com/topic/11-lfo-additional-controls-for-return-and-master-tracks/ http://designthemedia.com/topic/83-apc40-default-mapping/
As many m4l devices, parameters are automatically mapped on APC 40 , but in a non-logical order

Do you know how to config those parameters in m4l ? (i can use instrument rack of course, but with APC40, in this case, all default mapping with Live integrated devices are gone , because manual mapping has the priority against default mapping)]]> Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:19:29 +0000 http://designthemedia.com/topic/83-apc40-default-mapping/ http://designthemedia.com/topic/50-feature-requests/
The ability to copy all the parameters from one channel to another.

Obviously the probabilistic features of Uncanny Seq are what sets it apart, but i'm sure there are going to be a few lines in there that might be somewhat static. It would be nice to set some default settings, copy them to a few channels, and then start tweaking the probabilistic features.


Also, when UnSeq fires up, the default settings are completely different than if you hit the Reset ALL button on each channel.]]> Sun, 08 Jan 2012 12:30:34 +0000 http://designthemedia.com/topic/50-feature-requests/